EHAB vs. PNTG
EHAB (Enhabit Inc.) and PNTG (The Pennant Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Medical Care Facilities industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 3 years, EHAB returned 4.42%/yr vs 35.52%/yr for PNTG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EHAB vs. PNTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHAB achieves a 49.67% return, which is significantly higher than PNTG's 9.63% return.
EHAB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 49.67%
- 6M
- 45.11%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PNTG
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 35.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EHAB vs. PNTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHAB Enhabit Inc. | 49.67% | 18.05% | -24.54% | -21.35% | -42.13% |
PNTG The Pennant Group, Inc. | 9.63% | 6.15% | 90.52% | 26.78% | -14.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHAB and PNTG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2022 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
EHAB:
$730.02M
PNTG:
$1.10B
EHAB:
-$0.06
PNTG:
$0.86
EHAB:
0.67
PNTG:
1.07
EHAB:
1.32
PNTG:
3.19
EHAB:
$1.06B
PNTG:
$1.02B
EHAB:
$367.60M
PNTG:
$113.88M
EHAB:
$81.70M
PNTG:
$58.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHAB vs. PNTG — Risk / Return Rank
EHAB
PNTG
EHAB vs. PNTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enhabit Inc. (EHAB) and The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHAB | PNTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.18 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 0.54 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.29 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 0.61 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHAB | PNTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.18 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.18 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
EHAB vs. PNTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHAB drawdown since its inception was -71.33%, smaller than the maximum PNTG drawdown of -86.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHAB and PNTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHAB | PNTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.33% | -86.27% | +14.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.63% | -26.06% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.82% | -40.16% | -14.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.31% | -53.58% | +14.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.69% | -55.78% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.00% | 12.35% | +6.65% |
Volatility
EHAB vs. PNTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enhabit Inc. (EHAB) is 0.36%, while The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG) has a volatility of 15.83%. This indicates that EHAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHAB | PNTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 15.83% | -15.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.17% | 28.93% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.36% | 39.79% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.87% | 52.04% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.87% | 62.82% | -8.95% |
Dividends
EHAB vs. PNTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither EHAB nor PNTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EHAB vs. PNTG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enhabit Inc. and The Pennant Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EHAB vs. PNTG - Profitability Comparison
EHAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enhabit Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 264.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PNTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Pennant Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 285.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EHAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enhabit Inc. reported an operating income of 29.30M and revenue of 264.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
PNTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Pennant Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.30M and revenue of 285.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
EHAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enhabit Inc. reported a net income of 19.20M and revenue of 264.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
PNTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Pennant Group, Inc. reported a net income of 8.52M and revenue of 285.36M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EHAB and PNTG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNTG has higher volatility (15.83%) compared to EHAB (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHAB dropped -71.33% vs PNTG's -86.27%.
EHAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EHAB and PNTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer