EHAB vs. BTSG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EHAB (Enhabit Inc.) and BTSG (BrightSpring Health Services, Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — EHAB in Medical Care Facilities, BTSG in Health Information Services. Over the past year, EHAB returned 33.08% vs 157.42% for BTSG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EHAB vs. BTSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enhabit Inc. (EHAB) and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc (BTSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHAB achieves a 49.67% return, which is significantly lower than BTSG's 62.56% return.

EHAB

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 49.67%
• 6M: 45.11%
• 1Y: 33.08%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTSG

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: 13.71%
• YTD: 62.56%
• 6M: 73.35%
• 1Y: 157.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHAB vs. BTSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EHAB Enhabit Inc.	49.67%	18.05%	-26.53%
BTSG BrightSpring Health Services, Inc	62.56%	119.91%	54.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EHAB and BTSG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap EHAB : $730.02M BTSG : $13.47B
EPS EHAB : -$0.06 BTSG : $1.42
PS Ratio EHAB : 0.67 BTSG : 0.97
PB Ratio EHAB : 1.32 BTSG : 6.81
Total Revenue (TTM) EHAB : $1.06B BTSG : $13.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) EHAB : $367.60M BTSG : $1.66B
EBITDA (TTM) EHAB : $81.70M BTSG : $572.07M

Return for Risk

EHAB vs. BTSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHAB

EHAB Risk / Return Rank: 61
EHAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EHAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
EHAB Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EHAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EHAB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BTSG

BTSG Risk / Return Rank: 96
BTSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BTSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BTSG Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BTSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BTSG Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHAB vs. BTSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enhabit Inc. (EHAB) and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc (BTSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EHAB	BTSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	3.92	-3.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	4.08	-2.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.53	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	8.04	-7.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	25.90	-24.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EHAB vs. BTSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the BTSG Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHAB and BTSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EHAB	BTSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	3.92	-3.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	2.47	-2.69

Drawdowns

EHAB vs. BTSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHAB drawdown since its inception was -71.33%, which is greater than BTSG's maximum drawdown of -35.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHAB and BTSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHAB	BTSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.33%	-35.56%	-35.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.63%	-19.70%	-19.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.31%	-1.30%	-38.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.69%	-7.12%	-45.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.00%	6.10%	+12.90%

Volatility

EHAB vs. BTSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enhabit Inc. (EHAB) is 0.36%, while BrightSpring Health Services, Inc (BTSG) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that EHAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EHAB	BTSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	9.83%	-9.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.17%	28.79%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.36%	40.40%	+3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.87%	43.79%	+10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.87%	43.79%	+10.08%

Dividends

EHAB vs. BTSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither EHAB nor BTSG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EHAB vs. BTSG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enhabit Inc. and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EHAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enhabit Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 264.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BTSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc reported a gross profit of 482.22M and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.3%.

EHAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enhabit Inc. reported an operating income of 29.30M and revenue of 264.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

BTSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc reported an operating income of 121.45M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

EHAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enhabit Inc. reported a net income of 19.20M and revenue of 264.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

BTSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc reported a net income of 148.77M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHAB and BTSG in my portfolio?

EHAB and BTSG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EHAB or BTSG?

BTSG has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to EHAB (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHAB dropped -71.33% vs BTSG's -35.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.