PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNTG vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PNTG vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNTG achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 121.05% return.


PNTG

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
19.47%
6M
14.19%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
40.29%
5Y*
-4.21%
10Y*

VRT

1D
7.48%
1M
9.34%
YTD
121.05%
6M
115.41%
1Y
202.31%
3Y*
147.70%
5Y*
67.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNTG vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PNTG
The Pennant Group, Inc.
19.47%6.15%90.52%26.78%-52.43%-60.25%75.57%437.72%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
121.05%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%8.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PNTG and VRT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019

0.25

The correlation between PNTG and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PNTG:

$1.20B

VRT:

$140.37B

EPS

PNTG:

$0.86

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

PNTG:

39.33

VRT:

89.81

PEG Ratio

PNTG:

0.41

VRT:

0.39

PS Ratio

PNTG:

1.17

VRT:

12.91

PB Ratio

PNTG:

3.48

VRT:

33.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

PNTG:

$1.02B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PNTG:

$113.88M

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

PNTG:

$58.23M

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNTG vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNTG
PNTG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PNTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNTG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PNTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNTG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNTG vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNTGVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

8.04

-7.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

21.32

-19.64

PNTG vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNTG and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNTG vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNTG drawdown since its inception was -86.27%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNTG and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNTGVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.27%

-71.24%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.06%

-25.32%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.16%

-61.28%

+21.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.52%

-71.24%

-7.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.41%

-4.83%

-44.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.71%

-16.22%

-39.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.62%

9.53%

+3.09%

Volatility

PNTG vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG) is 12.30%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 17.12%. This indicates that PNTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNTGVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.30%

17.12%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.84%

45.12%

-15.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.35%

59.08%

-18.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.99%

62.12%

-10.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.10%

54.70%

+29.40%

Dividends

PNTG vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

PNTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PNTG
The Pennant Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.06%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

PNTG vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Pennant Group, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
285.36M
2.65B
(PNTG) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PNTG vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Pennant Group, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
37.7%
Portfolio components
PNTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Pennant Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 285.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

PNTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Pennant Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.30M and revenue of 285.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

PNTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Pennant Group, Inc. reported a net income of 8.52M and revenue of 285.36M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PNTG and VRT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to PNTG (12.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNTG dropped -86.27% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNTG and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer