EH vs. ADMA
EH (Ehang Holdings Ltd) and ADMA (ADMA Biologics, Inc.) are both stocks. EH operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ADMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, EH returned -27.88%/yr vs 40.41%/yr for ADMA. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EH vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EH achieves a -61.08% return, which is significantly lower than ADMA's -53.62% return.
EH
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -18.70%
- 6M
- -59.83%
- YTD
- -61.08%
- 1Y
- -69.64%
- 3Y*
- -38.93%
- 5Y*
- -27.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.62%
ADMA
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- 6M
- -51.10%
- YTD
- -53.62%
- 1Y
- -56.23%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 40.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.52M | $22.49M | $36.25M | |
| $3.84M | $5.49M | $7.98M |
EH vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EH Ehang Holdings Ltd | -61.08% | -16.29% | -6.28% | 95.80% | -42.49% | -29.32% | 96.37% | -14.34% |
ADMA ADMA Biologics, Inc. | -53.62% | 6.36% | 279.42% | 16.49% | 175.18% | -27.69% | -51.25% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between EH and ADMA is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2019 | 0.22 |
The correlation between EH and ADMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EH:
$190.37M
ADMA:
$1.96B
EH:
-CN¥8.72
ADMA:
$0.68
EH:
3.08
ADMA:
4.03
EH:
1.33
ADMA:
5.20
EH:
CN¥417.55M
ADMA:
$509.86M
EH:
CN¥256.90M
ADMA:
$312.42M
EH:
-CN¥286.70M
ADMA:
$218.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EH vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank
EH
ADMA
EH vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ehang Holdings Ltd (EH) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EH | ADMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.88 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | -1.50 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EH vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EH drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ADMA's maximum drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EH and ADMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EH | ADMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -91.28% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.79% | -62.71% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.47% | -68.99% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.31% | -68.99% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.87% | -65.48% | -30.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.07% | -53.17% | -21.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.07% | 36.56% | +3.51% |
Volatility
EH vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison
Ehang Holdings Ltd (EH) has a higher volatility of 17.74% compared to ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) at 8.87%. This indicates that EH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EH | ADMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.74% | 8.87% | +8.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.60% | 45.33% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.21% | 53.99% | +6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.44% | 59.37% | +25.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.01% | 68.58% | +31.43% |
Dividends
EH vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither EH nor ADMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EH vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ehang Holdings Ltd and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EH and ADMA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EH has higher volatility (17.74%) compared to ADMA (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EH dropped -97.07% vs ADMA's -91.28%.
ADMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.02 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EH and ADMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer