EGUS vs. IWM
EGUS (Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Growth Extended ESG Focus Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EGUS returned 26.92%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for IWM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
EGUS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGUS achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return.
EGUS
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 8.21%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
EGUS vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EGUS Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF | 12.08% | 19.02% | 32.85% | 27.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 17.07% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGUS and IWM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between EGUS and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
EGUS vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EGUS
IWM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
EGUS
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
EGUS
IWM
Industrials
EGUS
IWM
Communication Services
EGUS
IWM
Healthcare
EGUS
IWM
Financial Services
EGUS
IWM
Real Estate
EGUS
IWM
Energy
EGUS
IWM
Basic Materials
EGUS
IWM
Consumer Defensive
EGUS
IWM
Utilities
EGUS
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGUS vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
EGUS
IWM
EGUS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGUS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.56 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 12.64 | -5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGUS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.05 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.37 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
EGUS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGUS drawdown since its inception was -24.87%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGUS and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGUS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.87% | -59.05% | +34.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.66% | -11.03% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -27.50% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.49% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -10.77% | +7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 3.10% | +1.50% |
Volatility
EGUS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) is 3.98%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that EGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGUS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 5.75% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 13.53% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 19.20% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 22.52% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 23.04% | -3.89% |
EGUS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EGUS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
EGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than IWM's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGUS Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGUS and IWM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to EGUS (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGUS dropped -24.87% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 3-year performance, EGUS leads with 26.92% vs 17.88% for IWM. On fees, EGUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EGUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EGUS has performed better with a 26.92% return vs 17.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.19% for EGUS.
EGUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. EGUS tracks MSCI USA Growth Extended ESG Focus Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EGUS and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGUS and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer