PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGUS vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGUS vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGUS achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 30.53% return.


EGUS

1D
-2.34%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
7.09%
6M
5.77%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
-3.43%
1M
4.31%
YTD
30.53%
6M
28.10%
1Y
61.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGUS vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EGUS and FMTM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.64

The correlation between EGUS and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGUS vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGUS
EGUS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGUS vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGUSFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

5.06

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

19.29

-13.71

EGUS vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGUS and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGUS vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGUS drawdown since its inception was -24.87%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGUS and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGUSFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.87%

-12.12%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.66%

-12.12%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-3.43%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-1.91%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

3.17%

+1.53%

Volatility

EGUS vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) is 7.10%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that EGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGUSFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

9.38%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

19.05%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

24.27%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

23.68%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

23.68%

-4.35%

EGUS vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGUS vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

EGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than FMTM's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EGUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
0.21%0.22%0.25%0.36%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGUS and FMTM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to EGUS (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGUS dropped -24.87% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 61.05% vs 26.18% for EGUS. On fees, EGUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EGUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 61.05% return vs 26.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EGUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.21% for EGUS.

EGUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EGUS and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGUS and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer