EGRP.L vs. CMU.L
EGRP.L (WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from WisdomTree and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGRP.L returned 4.50%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGRP.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGRP.L achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.
EGRP.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 13.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRP.L WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR | 5.58% | 18.03% | -6.32% | 17.27% | -12.49% | 13.78% | 10.77% | 27.76% | -13.05% | 16.31% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGRP.L and CMU.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2017 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, EGRP.L and CMU.L have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Technology
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Energy
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Utilities
EGRP.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
EGRP.L
CMU.L
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRP.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGRP.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.58 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 9.67 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGRP.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.98 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.66 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGRP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.89%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRP.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGRP.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.89% | -32.53% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -11.43% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.93% | -11.95% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.89% | -21.11% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.18% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -5.80% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 3.05% | +0.82% |
Volatility
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRP.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) have volatilities of 5.10% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGRP.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 5.34% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 12.44% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 14.86% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 16.00% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 16.78% | +8.75% |
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGRP.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGRP.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
EGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EGRP.L WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR | 2.08% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 1.98% | 2.18% | 1.83% | 1.03% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGRP.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EGRP.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EGRP.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for EGRP.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer