EGRIX vs. RMDFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX).
EGRIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Aug 30, 2010. RMDFX is managed by Aspiriant. It was launched on Dec 13, 2015.
Performance
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund | 3.59% | 20.36% | 9.50% | 8.37% | -1.94% | 3.66% | 4.71% | 14.80% | -8.34% | 5.78% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 2.53% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 8.01% | -6.84% | 4.20% | 5.10% | 11.50% | -4.89% | 9.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGRIX achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than RMDFX's 2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EGRIX has outperformed RMDFX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while RMDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.
EGRIX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 19.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
RMDFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGRIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EGRIX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank
EGRIX
RMDFX
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGRIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.14 | 3.47 | +1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.91 | 4.74 | +2.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.37 | 1.75 | +0.62 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 4.07 | +2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.82 | 17.19 | +8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGRIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.14 | 3.47 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.15 | 0.83 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.61 | 0.79 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.78 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between EGRIX and RMDFX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison
EGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than RMDFX's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund | 6.42% | 6.65% | 6.00% | 3.40% | 4.82% | 4.89% | 5.82% | 4.15% | 0.06% | 3.22% | 1.78% | 6.67% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.52% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGRIX drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum RMDFX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRIX and RMDFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGRIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -15.96% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -4.19% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.18% | -14.63% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.17% | -15.96% | +1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -3.79% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -3.37% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.99% | -0.27% |
Volatility
EGRIX vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) have volatilities of 1.98% and 1.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EGRIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 1.99% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 3.83% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 5.01% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 6.34% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 6.20% | -2.25% |