EGRG.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EGRG.L (WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR Acc) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from WisdomTree and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGRG.L returned 4.19%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGRG.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR Acc (EGRG.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGRG.L achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.

EGRG.L

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 6.98%
• 1Y: 12.97%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: —

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EGRG.L WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR Acc	5.70%	19.51%	-7.58%	16.82%	-14.36%	18.71%	10.44%	23.27%	-12.36%	33.71%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.89%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-11.56%	17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EGRG.L and CMU.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2016	0.50

Over the past year, EGRG.L and CMU.L have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EGRG.L	CMU.L
Industrials	24.4%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	23.1%	10.1%
Financial Services	17.0%	21.8%
Technology	9.6%	30.8%
Communication Services	9.3%	2.3%
Healthcare	2.9%	4.2%
Basic Materials	2.7%	2.8%
Energy	1.2%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	5.2%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.3%
Utilities	0.2%	5.8%

Return for Risk

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGRG.L

EGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
EGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
EGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
EGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR Acc (EGRG.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EGRG.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.98	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.79	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.37	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	2.58	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.42	9.67	-6.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGRG.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGRG.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	1.98	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.66	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.49	+0.28

Drawdowns

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.27%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRG.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGRG.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.27%	-32.53%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.17%	-11.43%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.98%	-11.95%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.06%	-21.11%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.18%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-5.80%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	3.05%	+0.73%

Volatility

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR Acc (EGRG.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGRG.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	5.34%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.08%	12.44%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	14.86%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.39%	16.00%	+3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.58%	16.78%	+7.80%

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGRG.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGRG.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGRG.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGRG.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EGRG.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EGRG.L or CMU.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGRG.L or CMU.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EGRG.L.

What is the main difference between EGRG.L and CMU.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EGRG.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.