EGPT vs. QAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EGPT (VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EGPT tracks the MVIS Egypt Index while QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGPT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.

Performance

EGPT vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EGPT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QAT

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 1.83%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: 4.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGPT vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-11.22%	27.27%	-24.66%	11.31%	-11.53%	6.80%	-13.88%	24.83%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	-0.42%	8.81%	5.20%	2.72%	-7.23%	14.42%	6.94%	-0.44%	20.03%	-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EGPT and QAT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014	0.16

The correlation between EGPT and QAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EGPT vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EGPT	QAT
Real Estate	30.5%	3.9%
Basic Materials	23.4%	12.7%
Financial Services	10.5%	54.3%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	0.7%
Technology	8.0%	0.5%
Industrials	6.9%	13.2%
Communication Services	4.2%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	0.7%
Healthcare	2.0%	0.8%
Energy	1.1%	3.3%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

EGPT vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT

QAT Risk / Return Rank: 10
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 10
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGPT vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGPT	QAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.07	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EGPT	QAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-45.21%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-12.80%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.18%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EGPT	QAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.36%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.56%	—

EGPT vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGPT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGPT vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.15%	6.02%	1.32%	2.45%	2.50%	2.09%	1.72%	0.77%	1.60%	1.59%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	3.52%	3.51%	5.90%	3.92%	4.78%	2.33%	2.63%	3.57%	4.63%	4.10%	3.51%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGPT and QAT in my portfolio?

EGPT and QAT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EGPT or QAT?

On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGPT or QAT?

QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGPT or QAT?

QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.

What is the main difference between EGPT and QAT?

EGPT tracks MVIS Egypt Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EGPT and 0.59% for QAT.