EGPT vs. ECOW
EGPT (VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EGPT tracks the MVIS Egypt Index while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGPT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.
Performance
EGPT vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EGPT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECOW
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 30.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
EGPT vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -11.22% | 27.27% | -24.66% | 11.31% | -11.53% | -8.21% |
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 12.74% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGPT and ECOW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.17 |
The correlation between EGPT and ECOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EGPT vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EGPT
ECOW
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
EGPT
ECOW
-
Basic Materials
EGPT
ECOW
Financial Services
EGPT
ECOW
-
Consumer Defensive
EGPT
ECOW
Technology
EGPT
ECOW
Industrials
EGPT
ECOW
Communication Services
EGPT
ECOW
Consumer Cyclical
EGPT
ECOW
Healthcare
EGPT
ECOW
Energy
EGPT
ECOW
Utilities
EGPT
-
ECOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGPT vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank
EGPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ECOW
EGPT vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGPT | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGPT vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGPT | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -40.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.83% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.98% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility
EGPT vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGPT | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.85% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.78% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.08% | — |
EGPT vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGPT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGPT vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison
EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.45% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 6.02% | 1.32% | 2.45% | 2.50% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.77% | 1.60% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGPT and ECOW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECOW is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECOW is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.
EGPT tracks MVIS Egypt Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EGPT and 0.70% for ECOW.
Find the right allocation for EGPT and ECOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer