EGOG.L vs. UC15.L
EGOG.L (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EGOG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGOG.L returned -0.75%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for UC15.L. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. EGOG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGOG.L achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.49% return.
EGOG.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.75%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGOG.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis | -0.03% | 3.06% | 2.00% | 3.46% | -13.02% | -1.80% | -0.02% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.49% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | 6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGOG.L and UC15.L is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2020 | -0.13 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between EGOG.L and UC15.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.13 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
EGOG.L
UC15.L
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGOG.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.39 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 5.23 | -4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 13.93 | -11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGOG.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 2.12 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.87 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.33 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGOG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGOG.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGOG.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -42.93% | +26.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -6.18% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.48% | -13.98% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.73% | -17.43% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -3.53% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -15.17% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 2.32% | -1.10% |
Volatility
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) is 1.57%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that EGOG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGOG.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 5.07% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 12.34% | -9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 15.26% | -11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.63% | 14.69% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.62% | 14.80% | -6.18% |
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGOG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGOG.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
EGOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGOG.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis | 2.71% | 2.91% | 2.30% | 1.44% | 0.44% | 0.17% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGOG.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGOG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGOG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
EGOG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while UC15.L is Commodities. EGOG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EGOG.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for EGOG.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer