PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRV.DE's 18.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EGLN.L has underperformed ZPRV.DE with an annualized return of 10.77%, while ZPRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.


EGLN.L

1D
2.84%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
18.47%
10Y*
10.77%

ZPRV.DE

1D
2.02%
1M
7.15%
YTD
18.05%
6M
16.39%
1Y
38.06%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-0.76%46.01%34.32%9.37%6.00%3.85%13.68%20.59%3.38%-0.47%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
18.05%2.99%14.07%19.11%-5.40%48.22%-1.86%27.40%-11.77%-3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EGLN.L and ZPRV.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

-0.06

The correlation between EGLN.L and ZPRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGLN.L
EGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRV.DE
ZPRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGLN.LZPRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

6.40

-5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

20.02

-16.67

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGLN.L and ZPRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and ZPRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGLN.LZPRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.44%

-46.04%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-5.87%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-31.14%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

-31.14%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.21%

-46.04%

+19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.73%

0.00%

-19.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-9.12%

-13.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

1.88%

+5.29%

Volatility

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) at 3.33%. This indicates that EGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGLN.LZPRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

3.33%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

9.65%

+11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.72%

15.82%

+7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

20.38%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

22.87%

-6.87%

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGLN.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGLN.L nor ZPRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EGLN.L and ZPRV.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while ZPRV.DE is Small Cap Value Equities. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and ZPRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer