PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGLN.L is traded in EUR, while XGDU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGDU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than XGDU.L's -3.44% return.


EGLN.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-8.89%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-7.35%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
10.12%

XGDU.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-8.57%
YTD
-3.44%
6M
-7.18%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
25.94%
5Y*
18.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-3.74%46.01%34.32%9.37%6.00%3.85%-0.23%
XGDU.L
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities
-3.44%45.18%34.52%10.05%6.10%3.10%-1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EGLN.L and XGDU.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020

0.94

The correlation between EGLN.L and XGDU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGLN.L
EGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XGDU.L
XGDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XGDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XGDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGLN.LXGDU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

2.99

-0.07

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the XGDU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGLN.L and XGDU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, which is greater than XGDU.L's maximum drawdown of -22.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and XGDU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGLN.LXGDU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.44%

-22.41%

-25.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.19%

-22.41%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

-22.41%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-22.41%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.14%

-22.03%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-6.29%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

8.04%

-0.04%

Volatility

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) is 7.96%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that EGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGLN.LXGDU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

8.89%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.28%

22.55%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

25.22%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

16.97%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

16.70%

-0.70%

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XGDU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EGLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGLN.L nor XGDU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EGLN.L and XGDU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XGDU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGDU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.

EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while XGDU.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.12% for XGDU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and XGDU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer