PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGLN.L is traded in EUR, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 11.91% return.


EGLN.L

1D
2.84%
1M
-9.14%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
18.47%
10Y*
10.77%

VWRA.L

1D
2.40%
1M
2.16%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.56%
1Y
25.93%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-0.76%46.01%34.32%9.37%6.00%3.85%13.68%6.46%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
11.91%7.92%25.41%18.61%-13.03%27.32%6.62%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EGLN.L and VWRA.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019

0.04

Over the past year, EGLN.L and VWRA.L have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGLN.L
EGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGLN.LVWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

4.04

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

15.18

-11.82

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGLN.L and VWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and VWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGLN.LVWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.44%

-33.09%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-6.39%

-15.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-20.09%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

-20.09%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.73%

-1.46%

-18.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-4.66%

-17.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

1.70%

+5.47%

Volatility

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 4.13%. This indicates that EGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGLN.LVWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

4.13%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

9.73%

+11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.72%

12.67%

+11.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

14.59%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

16.72%

-0.72%

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EGLN.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGLN.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EGLN.L and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRA.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.

EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and VWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer