EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L
EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EGLN.L returned 10.11%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for ANXG.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. EGLN.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EGLN.L is traded in EUR, while ANXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANXG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than ANXG.L's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EGLN.L has underperformed ANXG.L with an annualized return of 10.11%, while ANXG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.
EGLN.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- 6M
- -10.78%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 26.45%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 30.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.30%
- 10Y*
- 17.43%
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -3.62% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | 13.68% | 20.59% | 3.38% | -0.47% |
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.17% | 5.87% | 34.91% | 51.14% | -29.26% | 38.29% | 35.58% | 42.74% | -22.98% | 27.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and ANXG.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | -0.00 |
The correlation between EGLN.L and ANXG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EGLN.L
ANXG.L
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGLN.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.00 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 8.68 | -6.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, which is greater than ANXG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and ANXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGLN.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.44% | -32.74% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.42% | -10.13% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.42% | -26.49% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | -31.37% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.05% | -32.74% | +6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -2.79% | -19.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.52% | -7.57% | -14.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | 3.50% | +5.93% |
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) at 6.10%. This indicates that EGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGLN.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 6.10% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.16% | 12.60% | +8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.45% | 16.93% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 20.04% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 22.02% | -5.97% |
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGLN.L nor ANXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EGLN.L and ANXG.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.
EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while ANXG.L is Nasdaq-100. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.13% for ANXG.L.
Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and ANXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer