EGGS vs. FYEE
EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and FYEE (Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 28.00% vs 25.67% for FYEE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FYEE.
Performance
EGGS vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than FYEE's 7.35% return.
EGGS
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 10.44%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 6M
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYEE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 25.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGS vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 17.56% | 14.41% | -1.96% |
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.35% | 15.76% | -1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGS and FYEE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between EGGS and FYEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGS vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank
EGGS
FYEE
EGGS vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGGS | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 2.68 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 3.60 | -1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.54 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.50 | -1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 17.93 | -14.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGGS | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.68 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.26 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
EGGS vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FYEE drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and FYEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGS | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -18.79% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -7.39% | -10.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -2.25% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 1.44% | +6.52% |
Volatility
EGGS vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 1.36%. This indicates that EGGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGS | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.87% | 1.36% | +7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.12% | 7.27% | +11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 9.63% | +13.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 13.85% | +10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 13.85% | +10.56% |
EGGS vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGS vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison
EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than FYEE's 7.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 15.44% | 14.52% | 0.00% |
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.54% | 7.08% | 5.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGS and FYEE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGS has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to FYEE (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs FYEE's -18.79%.
On 1-year performance, EGGS leads with 28.00% vs 25.67% for FYEE. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGS has performed better with a 28.00% return vs 25.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGS.
EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 7.54% for FYEE.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.28% for FYEE.
FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGS and FYEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer