EGGS vs. DYLG
EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. EGGS is actively managed, while DYLG is passively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 7.11% vs 20.19% for DYLG. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DYLG.
Performance
EGGS vs. DYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than DYLG's 8.59% return.
EGGS
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.62%
DYLG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.24K | $30.29K | $73.30K | |
| $346.93K | $392.42K | $515.09K |
EGGS vs. DYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 5.83% | 14.41% | -1.62% |
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 8.59% | 12.50% | -1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGS and DYLG is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGS vs. DYLG — Risk / Return Rank
EGGS
DYLG
EGGS vs. DYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGGS | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.37 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 2.30 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | 9.40 | -8.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGGS vs. DYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, which is greater than DYLG's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and DYLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGS | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.23% | -13.98% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.23% | -8.31% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.16% | -0.15% | -16.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -1.78% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 2.03% | +7.04% |
Volatility
EGGS vs. DYLG - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) at 3.02%. This indicates that EGGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGS | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.49% | 3.02% | +13.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.07% | 7.91% | +19.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.46% | 9.70% | +20.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 11.35% | +16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 11.35% | +16.99% |
EGGS vs. DYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGS vs. DYLG - Dividend Comparison
EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.32%, more than DYLG's 9.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 9.22% | 9.63% | 16.55% | 1.38% |
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF | 19.32% | 14.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGS and DYLG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGS has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to DYLG (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -24.23% vs DYLG's -13.98%.
On 1-year performance, DYLG leads with 20.19% vs 7.11% for EGGS. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DYLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DYLG has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGS.
EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 19.32%, compared with 9.22% for DYLG.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.35% for DYLG.
DYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGS and DYLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer