EGGS vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGGS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by NestYield, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. EGGS is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 24.65% vs 2014.90% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

EGGS vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 990.13% return.

EGGS

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 6.43%
• YTD: 16.66%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 11.71%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 990.13%
• 6M: 857.64%
• 1Y: 2,014.90%
• 3Y*: 145.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	16.66%	14.41%	-1.96%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	990.13%	96.22%	-1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and BWET is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024	-0.14

Return for Risk

EGGS vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS

EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 28
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EGGS	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	20.67	-19.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	6.77	-5.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.99	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	66.60	-65.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	176.91	-173.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGGS vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 20.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGGS	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	20.67	-19.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	2.01	-1.15

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGS	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-56.90%	+38.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.17%	-30.64%	+12.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.90%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-24.06%	+18.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.96%	11.51%	-3.55%

Volatility

EGGS vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is 8.78%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 28.88%. This indicates that EGGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGS	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.78%	28.88%	-20.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.13%	88.79%	-69.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.26%	98.73%	-75.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.35%	70.70%	-46.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.35%	70.70%	-46.35%

EGGS vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGS vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.56%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	15.56%	14.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGS and BWET in my portfolio?

EGGS and BWET have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGGS or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (28.88%) compared to EGGS (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, EGGS or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 2014.90% vs 24.65% for EGGS. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EGGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGS or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 2014.90% return vs 24.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGS or BWET?

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGS or BWET?

EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 15.56%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between EGGS and BWET?

EGGS is categorized as Derivative Income, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.67 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.