EGGQ vs. TCAL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) and TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGQ returned 61.68% vs 0.07% for TCAL. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. EGGQ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TCAL.

Performance

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGQ achieves a 39.75% return, which is significantly higher than TCAL's -1.64% return.

EGGQ

• 1D: -6.25%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: 39.75%
• 6M: 36.73%
• 1Y: 61.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TCAL

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: -1.64%
• 6M: -2.59%
• 1Y: 0.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	39.75%	35.36%
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	-1.64%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGQ and TCAL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.00

Return for Risk

EGGQ vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGQ

EGGQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
EGGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EGGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EGGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EGGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EGGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

TCAL

TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 8
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGGQ	TCAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.01	+1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	0.08	+2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.01	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	0.01	+3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	0.03	+8.33

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the TCAL Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGQ and TCAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and TCAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGQ	TCAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-7.24%	-15.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.76%	-7.00%	-12.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.25%	-4.72%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-2.12%	-3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.41%	2.86%	+4.55%

Volatility

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) at 3.09%. This indicates that EGGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGQ	TCAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.85%	3.09%	+12.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.31%	7.10%	+21.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.06%	9.54%	+24.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.14%	11.26%	+22.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.14%	11.26%	+22.88%

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGQ vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison

EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than TCAL's 11.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	5.47%	5.70%
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	11.81%	8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGQ and TCAL in my portfolio?

EGGQ and TCAL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGGQ or TCAL?

EGGQ has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to TCAL (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGQ dropped -22.70% vs TCAL's -7.24%.

Which ETF is better, EGGQ or TCAL?

On 1-year performance, EGGQ leads with 61.68% vs 0.07% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGQ or TCAL?

Over the 1-year period, EGGQ has performed better with a 61.68% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGQ or TCAL?

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGQ or TCAL?

TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 11.81%, compared with 5.47% for EGGQ.

What is the main difference between EGGQ and TCAL?

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGQ and 0.34% for TCAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.