PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGGQ vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
-7.11%25.92%-1.32%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-9.73%17.50%-0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGQ achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return.


EGGQ

1D
1.67%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-7.11%
6M
-13.25%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.96%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
-9.73%
6M
-8.15%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EGGQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EGGQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGQ
EGGQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EGGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EGGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGGQSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.76

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.24

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.09

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.17

3.71

+0.46

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGQ and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGGQSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.76

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.79

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between EGGQ and SCHG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
7.28%5.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Drawdowns

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and SCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EGGQSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.70%

-34.59%

+11.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.76%

-16.41%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.98%

-12.51%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.22%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.15%

4.84%

+2.31%

Volatility

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that EGGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EGGQSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.15%

6.77%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.01%

12.54%

+10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.28%

22.45%

+9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.35%

22.31%

+9.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.35%

21.51%

+9.84%