EGGQ vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by NestYield, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. EGGQ is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, EGGQ returned 71.68% vs 20.89% for SCHG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGGQ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGQ achieves a 49.06% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.76% return.

EGGQ

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 17.11%
• YTD: 49.06%
• 6M: 46.56%
• 1Y: 71.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 13.68%
• 10Y*: 18.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	49.06%	25.92%	-0.88%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	2.76%	17.50%	-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGQ and SCHG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024	0.77

The correlation between EGGQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EGGQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGQ

EGGQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
EGGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EGGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EGGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EGGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EGGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 33
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGGQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.30	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	1.79	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.23	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	1.28	+2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	4.19	+5.53

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGQ	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-34.59%	+11.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.76%	-16.41%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.16%	+5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-5.20%	-0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	5.00%	+2.40%

Volatility

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a higher volatility of 14.60% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.78%. This indicates that EGGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGQ	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.60%	5.78%	+8.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.58%	12.50%	+15.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.50%	16.21%	+17.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.77%	22.37%	+11.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.77%	21.61%	+12.16%

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	5.13%	5.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGQ and SCHG in my portfolio?

EGGQ and SCHG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGGQ or SCHG?

EGGQ has higher volatility (14.60%) compared to SCHG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGQ dropped -22.70% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, EGGQ or SCHG?

On 1-year performance, EGGQ leads with 71.68% vs 20.89% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGQ or SCHG?

Over the 1-year period, EGGQ has performed better with a 71.68% return vs 20.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGQ or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGQ or SCHG?

EGGQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between EGGQ and SCHG?

EGGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.