PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EGDM.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGDM.L is traded in GBP, while DEMS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DEMS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGDM.L achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than DEMS.L's 18.95% return.


EGDM.L

1D
-1.60%
1M
6.55%
YTD
25.08%
6M
26.80%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*

DEMS.L

1D
0.29%
1M
5.82%
YTD
18.95%
6M
18.43%
1Y
31.01%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EGDM.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
25.08%26.25%8.50%2.10%-12.36%-1.65%15.68%2.53%
DEMS.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc
18.95%12.50%7.08%14.64%-2.59%15.41%-9.66%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EGDM.L and DEMS.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019

0.80

The correlation between EGDM.L and DEMS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EGDM.L
DEMS.L

Technology

43.1%
22.9%

Financial Services

17.9%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
7.9%

Industrials

7.0%
11.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.5%
5.9%

Energy

3.4%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
8.3%

Healthcare

2.6%
1.8%

Utilities

1.7%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
4.6%

Technology

EGDM.L
43.1%
DEMS.L
22.9%

Financial Services

EGDM.L
17.9%
DEMS.L
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EGDM.L
8.6%
DEMS.L
7.9%

Industrials

EGDM.L
7.0%
DEMS.L
11.0%

Communication Services

EGDM.L
6.3%
DEMS.L
5.1%

Basic Materials

EGDM.L
5.5%
DEMS.L
5.9%

Energy

EGDM.L
3.4%
DEMS.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

EGDM.L
2.7%
DEMS.L
8.3%

Healthcare

EGDM.L
2.6%
DEMS.L
1.8%

Utilities

EGDM.L
1.7%
DEMS.L
4.2%

Real Estate

EGDM.L
1.3%
DEMS.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGDM.L
EGDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EGDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EGDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMS.L
DEMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DEMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EGDM.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGDM.LDEMS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.48

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

4.77

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

16.97

-1.09

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the DEMS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGDM.L and DEMS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGDM.LDEMS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.67

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.86

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.54

-0.02

Drawdowns

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGDM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.27%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMS.L drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGDM.L and DEMS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGDM.LDEMS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.27%

-29.57%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-6.47%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-12.88%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-14.79%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-1.15%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.18%

-5.01%

-7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.82%

+1.41%

Volatility

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EGDM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) at 4.53%. This indicates that EGDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGDM.LDEMS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

4.53%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

9.27%

+5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

11.58%

+5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

12.78%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

15.65%

+2.36%

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMS.L's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGDM.L vs. DEMS.L - Dividend Comparison

EGDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while DEMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DEMS.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EGDM.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.51%1.88%2.34%2.37%2.55%1.96%1.62%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGDM.L and DEMS.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EGDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EGDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EGDM.L and 0.46% for DEMS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGDM.L and DEMS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer