PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFZ vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFZ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFZ achieves a -7.64% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -55.56% return.


EFZ

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-7.64%
6M
-9.27%
1Y
-14.29%
3Y*
-10.18%
5Y*
-5.52%
10Y*
-8.30%

BITU

1D
-5.61%
1M
-40.78%
YTD
-55.56%
6M
-61.06%
1Y
-73.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFZ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EFZ
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
-7.64%-20.92%5.92%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-55.56%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EFZ and BITU is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFZ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFZ
EFZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFZ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFZBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.84

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.92

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

-1.48

+0.01

EFZ vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFZ and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFZBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

-0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

-0.37

+0.02

Drawdowns

EFZ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFZ drawdown since its inception was -88.08%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -80.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFZ and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFZBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.08%

-80.13%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-80.13%

+62.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.91%

-80.13%

-7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.09%

-34.58%

-32.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.77%

50.09%

-40.32%

Volatility

EFZ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is 5.08%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.31%. This indicates that EFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFZBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

18.31%

-13.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

68.43%

-54.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

87.07%

-70.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

97.43%

-80.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

97.43%

-80.05%

EFZ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFZ and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

EFZ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than BITU's 88.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
88.31%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFZ
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
4.07%4.55%5.29%4.66%0.57%0.00%0.04%1.56%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFZ and BITU have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to EFZ (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFZ dropped -88.08% vs BITU's -80.13%.

On 1-year performance, EFZ leads with -14.29% vs -73.89% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -14.29% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFZ and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 4.07% for EFZ.

EFZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFZ and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer