EFZ vs. BITU
EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EFZ returned -14.29% vs -73.89% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EFZ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFZ achieves a -7.64% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -55.56% return.
EFZ
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -7.64%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- 1Y
- -14.29%
- 3Y*
- -10.18%
- 5Y*
- -5.52%
- 10Y*
- -8.30%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.61%
- 1M
- -40.78%
- YTD
- -55.56%
- 6M
- -61.06%
- 1Y
- -73.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFZ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -7.64% | -20.92% | 5.92% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -55.56% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFZ and BITU is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFZ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
EFZ
BITU
EFZ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.84 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.92 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -1.48 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | -0.85 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | -0.37 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
EFZ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFZ drawdown since its inception was -88.08%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -80.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFZ and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.08% | -80.13% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | -80.13% | +62.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.91% | -80.13% | -7.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.09% | -34.58% | -32.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.77% | 50.09% | -40.32% |
Volatility
EFZ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is 5.08%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.31%. This indicates that EFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFZ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 18.31% | -13.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 68.43% | -54.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 87.07% | -70.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 97.43% | -80.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 97.43% | -80.05% |
EFZ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EFZ and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EFZ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than BITU's 88.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 88.31% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 4.07% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFZ and BITU have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to EFZ (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFZ dropped -88.08% vs BITU's -80.13%.
On 1-year performance, EFZ leads with -14.29% vs -73.89% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -14.29% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFZ and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 4.07% for EFZ.
EFZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFZ and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer