EFZ vs. BERZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) and BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - EFZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%) while BERZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFZ returned -10.01%/yr vs -74.69%/yr for BERZ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EFZ vs. BERZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFZ achieves a -6.98% return, which is significantly higher than BERZ's -55.66% return.

EFZ

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: -6.98%
• 6M: -6.74%
• 1Y: -15.21%
• 3Y*: -10.01%
• 5Y*: -5.55%
• 10Y*: -8.83%

BERZ

• 1D: 11.73%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: -55.66%
• 6M: -53.62%
• 1Y: -80.66%
• 3Y*: -74.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFZ vs. BERZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE	-6.98%	-20.92%	2.90%	-10.38%	13.15%	-1.33%
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-55.66%	-78.81%	-65.95%	-89.12%	102.85%	-28.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EFZ and BERZ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.63

The correlation between EFZ and BERZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EFZ vs. BERZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFZ

EFZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BERZ

BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFZ vs. BERZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFZ	BERZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	-0.99	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.24	-2.23	+0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.77	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.96	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	-1.56	+0.04

EFZ vs. BERZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the BERZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFZ and BERZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFZ vs. BERZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFZ drawdown since its inception was -88.08%, smaller than the maximum BERZ drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFZ and BERZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFZ	BERZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.08%	-99.80%	+11.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.09%	-84.60%	+67.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.42%	-98.87%	+63.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.82%	-99.73%	+11.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.13%	-71.81%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.10%	54.31%	-44.21%

Volatility

EFZ vs. BERZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is 5.39%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a volatility of 34.10%. This indicates that EFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BERZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFZ	BERZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	34.10%	-28.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.12%	63.77%	-49.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.82%	81.37%	-64.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	92.80%	-75.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	92.80%	-75.64%

EFZ vs. BERZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFZ and BERZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EFZ vs. BERZ - Dividend Comparison

EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE	4.04%	4.55%	5.29%	4.66%	0.57%	0.00%	0.04%	1.56%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFZ and BERZ in my portfolio?

EFZ and BERZ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFZ or BERZ?

BERZ has higher volatility (34.10%) compared to EFZ (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFZ dropped -88.08% vs BERZ's -99.80%.

Which ETF is better, EFZ or BERZ?

On 3-year performance, EFZ leads with -10.01% vs -74.69% for BERZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFZ or BERZ?

Over the 3-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -10.01% return vs -74.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFZ or BERZ?

EFZ and BERZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFZ or BERZ?

EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.

What is the main difference between EFZ and BERZ?

EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%), while BERZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.91 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.