PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFZ vs. AMZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFZ vs. AMZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFZ vs. AMZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EFZ
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
-0.56%-20.92%2.90%-10.38%-7.90%
AMZD
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares
9.88%-9.84%-30.80%-46.50%45.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFZ achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than AMZD's 9.88% return.


EFZ

1D
-3.23%
1M
8.61%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
-16.07%
3Y*
-7.87%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
-8.06%

AMZD

1D
-3.65%
1M
0.55%
YTD
9.88%
6M
3.33%
1Y
-13.66%
3Y*
-22.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFZ vs. AMZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZD's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EFZ vs. AMZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFZ
EFZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
EFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZD
AMZD Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
AMZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFZ vs. AMZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFZAMZDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.87

-0.39

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.19

-0.33

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.96

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.35

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.72

-0.51

-0.21

EFZ vs. AMZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the AMZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFZ and AMZD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFZAMZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

-0.39

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

-0.48

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between EFZ and AMZD is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EFZ vs. AMZD - Dividend Comparison

EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than AMZD's 2.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EFZ
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
3.78%4.55%5.29%4.66%0.57%0.00%0.04%1.56%0.34%
AMZD
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares
2.85%3.61%5.15%6.83%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFZ vs. AMZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFZ drawdown since its inception was -88.08%, which is greater than AMZD's maximum drawdown of -70.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFZ and AMZD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFZAMZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.08%

-70.44%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.95%

-35.54%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.98%

-64.25%

-22.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-48.04%

-18.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.44%

24.83%

-3.39%

Volatility

EFZ vs. AMZD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is 8.44%, while Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that EFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFZAMZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

9.69%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

23.17%

-10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

35.02%

-16.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

33.63%

-17.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

33.63%

-16.32%