EFV vs. VDE
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net), while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFV returned 10.55%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for VDE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
EFV vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 29.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 10.55%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
EFV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
VDE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 29.66%
- 6M
- 28.33%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
EFV vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 10.56% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.66% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and VDE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EFV and VDE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EFV vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
VDE
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EFV
VDE
-
Industrials
EFV
VDE
Consumer Defensive
EFV
VDE
-
Healthcare
EFV
VDE
-
Energy
EFV
VDE
Basic Materials
EFV
VDE
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
VDE
-
Utilities
EFV
VDE
-
Communication Services
EFV
VDE
-
Technology
EFV
VDE
-
Real Estate
EFV
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
VDE
EFV vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFV | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.20 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 8.95 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFV vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -74.20% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -11.80% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -21.41% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -26.58% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -69.29% | +26.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -8.26% | +7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -19.95% | +5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 4.21% | -1.25% |
Volatility
EFV vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 4.62%, while Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 7.15% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 16.59% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 20.46% | -5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 26.45% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 29.93% | -12.08% |
EFV vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than VDE's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.76% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.42% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFV and VDE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.55% vs 9.39% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EFV.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.42% for VDE.
EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net), while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EFV and 0.09% for VDE.
EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer