EFV vs. SHYG
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and SHYG (iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index, while SHYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFV returned 10.55%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for SHYG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SHYG.
Performance
EFV vs. SHYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than SHYG's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has outperformed SHYG with an annualized return of 10.55%, while SHYG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.22% annualized return.
EFV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
SHYG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
EFV vs. SHYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 10.56% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
SHYG iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.72% | 7.94% | 8.17% | 10.38% | -4.71% | 4.60% | 3.15% | 9.93% | 0.02% | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and SHYG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EFV and SHYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFV vs. SHYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
SHYG
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFV
SHYG
-
Industrials
EFV
SHYG
-
Consumer Defensive
EFV
SHYG
-
Healthcare
EFV
SHYG
-
Energy
EFV
SHYG
-
Basic Materials
EFV
SHYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
SHYG
-
Utilities
EFV
SHYG
Communication Services
EFV
SHYG
-
Technology
EFV
SHYG
-
Real Estate
EFV
SHYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. SHYG — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
SHYG
EFV vs. SHYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFV | SHYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.70 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 16.02 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFV vs. SHYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than SHYG's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and SHYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | SHYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -19.26% | -44.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -1.75% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -4.53% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -9.39% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -19.26% | -23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | 0.00% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -1.44% | -13.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 0.40% | +2.56% |
Volatility
EFV vs. SHYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) at 0.98%. This indicates that EFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | SHYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 0.98% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 2.55% | +9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 3.20% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 5.73% | +10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 6.42% | +11.43% |
EFV vs. SHYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SHYG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. SHYG - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than SHYG's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.76% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
SHYG iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.00% | 7.03% | 6.93% | 6.54% | 5.57% | 4.83% | 5.07% | 5.33% | 5.90% | 5.49% | 5.53% | 5.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFV and SHYG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFV has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to SHYG (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs SHYG's -19.26%.
On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.55% vs 5.22% for SHYG. On fees, SHYG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHYG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.
SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 3.76% for EFV.
EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SHYG is High Yield Bonds. EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while SHYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.30% for SHYG.
SHYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and SHYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer