EFRA vs. OIH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH).
EFRA and OIH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Nov 1, 2022. OIH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both EFRA and OIH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EFRA vs. OIH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFRA vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 4.38% | 13.76% | 8.09% | 14.49% | 7.48% |
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 40.13% | 6.81% | -10.53% | 3.20% | 2.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 40.13% return.
EFRA
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OIH
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 40.13%
- 6M
- 56.02%
- 1Y
- 52.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- -0.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFRA vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFRA vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank
EFRA
OIH
EFRA vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFRA | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.88 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.01 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 5.57 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFRA | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | -0.00 | +0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFRA and OIH is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EFRA vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison
EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than OIH's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 4.15% | 4.34% | 3.79% | 1.85% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 1.22% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
Drawdowns
EFRA vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and OIH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFRA | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -94.45% | +78.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -16.94% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -64.46% | +56.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -48.76% | +45.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 9.44% | -6.22% |
Volatility
EFRA vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is 6.01%, while VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that EFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFRA | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 8.54% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 21.75% | -11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 38.07% | -21.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 37.47% | -22.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 42.49% | -27.04% |