EFR vs. APLY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EFR (Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust) is a stock, while APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) is Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past 3 years, EFR returned 7.57%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for APLY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EFR vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFR achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than APLY's 9.80% return.

EFR

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: -1.99%
• 6M: -1.75%
• 1Y: -3.23%
• 3Y*: 7.57%
• 5Y*: 3.46%
• 10Y*: 5.65%

APLY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 7.32%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFR vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust	-1.99%	-4.85%	11.32%	20.62%
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	9.80%	4.69%	18.62%	11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EFR and APLY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2023	0.19

Return for Risk

EFR vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFR

EFR Risk / Return Rank: 25
EFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EFR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

APLY

APLY Risk / Return Rank: 61
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 64
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFR vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFR	APLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	2.08	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.53	2.85	-3.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.38	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	3.17	-3.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	8.09	-8.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFR vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFR Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the APLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFR and APLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFR	APLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	2.08	-2.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.69	-0.40

Drawdowns

EFR vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFR drawdown since its inception was -60.55%, which is greater than APLY's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR and APLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFR	APLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.55%	-30.41%	-30.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-11.76%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	-30.41%	+12.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.02%	-0.58%	-10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.01%	-6.92%	-2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.40%	4.60%	+0.80%

Volatility

EFR vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) is 1.99%, while YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that EFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFR	APLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	3.78%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	13.03%	-6.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.06%	17.98%	-9.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.06%	20.96%	-7.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	20.96%	-6.00%

Dividends

EFR vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, less than APLY's 35.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	35.75%	36.38%	24.95%	14.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust	9.04%	9.53%	9.76%	10.37%	10.39%	5.62%	6.39%	7.34%	7.46%	5.42%	5.82%	6.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFR and APLY in my portfolio?

EFR and APLY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFR or APLY?

APLY has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to EFR (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFR dropped -60.55% vs APLY's -30.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.