EFR vs. APLY
EFR (Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust) is a stock, while APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) is Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past 3 years, EFR returned 6.28%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for APLY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFR vs. APLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than APLY's 14.78% return.
EFR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- -4.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.91%
APLY
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 1Y
- 38.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFR vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust | -0.26% | -4.85% | 11.32% | 20.73% |
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 14.78% | 4.69% | 18.62% | 11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR and APLY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank
EFR
APLY
EFR vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFR | APLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.37 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.26 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 7.84 | -8.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFR vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR drawdown since its inception was -60.55%, which is greater than APLY's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR and APLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR | APLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.55% | -30.41% | -30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -11.76% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -30.41% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | 0.00% | -9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -6.81% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 4.88% | +0.88% |
Volatility
EFR vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) is 1.31%, while YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that EFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFR | APLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 9.53% | -8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.57% | 16.20% | -9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 20.00% | -12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 21.36% | -8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 21.36% | -6.45% |
Dividends
EFR vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison
EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, less than APLY's 34.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.80% | 36.38% | 24.95% | 14.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust | 8.61% | 9.53% | 9.76% | 10.37% | 10.39% | 5.62% | 6.39% | 7.34% | 7.46% | 5.42% | 5.82% | 6.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFR and APLY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APLY has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to EFR (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFR dropped -60.55% vs APLY's -30.41%.
APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFR and APLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer