EFOR vs. SWKS
EFOR (Everforth, Inc.) and SWKS (Skyworks Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. EFOR operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while SWKS operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EFOR returned -7.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SWKS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFOR vs. SWKS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFOR achieves a -62.05% return, which is significantly lower than SWKS's -6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EFOR has underperformed SWKS with an annualized return of -7.04%, while SWKS has yielded a comparatively higher 0.75% annualized return.
EFOR
- 1D
- 4.22%
- 1M
- -13.04%
- 6M
- -64.02%
- YTD
- -62.05%
- 1Y
- -62.40%
- 3Y*
- -38.60%
- 5Y*
- -28.40%
- 10Y*
- -7.04%
SWKS
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- -21.27%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 1Y
- -19.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.69%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
EFOR vs. SWKS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | -62.05% | -42.20% | -13.34% | 18.03% | -33.97% | 47.73% | 17.70% | 30.22% | -15.20% | 45.54% |
SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | -6.24% | -25.49% | -18.86% | 26.55% | -39.95% | 2.73% | 28.36% | 84.10% | -28.30% | 28.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFOR and SWKS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 1992 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EFOR and SWKS has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
EFOR:
$749.48M
SWKS:
$8.76B
EFOR:
$2.27
SWKS:
$2.38
EFOR:
8.06
SWKS:
24.51
EFOR:
0.20
SWKS:
2.19
EFOR:
$3.98B
SWKS:
$4.04B
EFOR:
$1.10B
SWKS:
$1.66B
EFOR:
$446.30M
SWKS:
$621.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFOR vs. SWKS — Risk / Return Rank
EFOR
SWKS
EFOR vs. SWKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFOR | SWKS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.95 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.56 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | -0.99 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFOR vs. SWKS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFOR drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SWKS drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFOR and SWKS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFOR | SWKS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.98% | -96.12% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.34% | -35.24% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.72% | -58.20% | -25.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.00% | -72.55% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.00% | -72.88% | -14.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.07% | -66.21% | -19.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.85% | -55.81% | +16.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.45% | 19.76% | +14.69% |
Volatility
EFOR vs. SWKS - Volatility Comparison
Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) has a higher volatility of 23.73% compared to Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) at 14.82%. This indicates that EFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFOR | SWKS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.73% | 14.82% | +8.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 85.46% | 36.31% | +49.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.32% | 44.04% | +30.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.83% | 41.06% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.69% | 40.13% | +1.56% |
Dividends
EFOR vs. SWKS - Dividend Comparison
EFOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 4.88% | 4.45% | 3.11% | 2.31% | 2.59% | 1.37% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 2.09% | 1.26% | 1.45% | 1.02% |
Financials
EFOR vs. SWKS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everforth, Inc. and Skyworks Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFOR vs. SWKS - Profitability Comparison
EFOR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 249.50M and revenue of 968.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.
SWKS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 385.40M and revenue of 943.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
EFOR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.50M and revenue of 968.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
SWKS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.10M and revenue of 943.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
EFOR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a net income of 5.50M and revenue of 968.30M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
SWKS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 35.60M and revenue of 943.70M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFOR and SWKS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFOR has higher volatility (23.73%) compared to SWKS (14.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFOR dropped -95.98% vs SWKS's -96.12%.
SWKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFOR and SWKS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer