EFOR vs. SWKS
EFOR (Everforth, Inc.) and SWKS (Skyworks Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. EFOR operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while SWKS operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EFOR returned -2.25%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for SWKS. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EFOR vs. SWKS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFOR achieves a -40.96% return, which is significantly lower than SWKS's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EFOR has underperformed SWKS with an annualized return of -2.25%, while SWKS has yielded a comparatively higher 1.75% annualized return.
EFOR
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 61.04%
- 6M
- -45.40%
- YTD
- -40.96%
- 1Y
- -41.48%
- 3Y*
- -28.42%
- 5Y*
- -22.41%
- 10Y*
- -2.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.31%
SWKS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- -4.12%
- 3Y*
- -15.36%
- 5Y*
- -17.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | $27.62M | $22.21M | $22.74M |
| $426.23M | $361.62M | $391.18M |
EFOR vs. SWKS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | -40.96% | -42.20% | -13.34% | 18.03% | -33.97% | 47.73% | 17.70% | 30.22% | -15.20% | 45.54% |
SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 0.26% | -25.49% | -18.86% | 26.55% | -39.95% | 2.73% | 28.36% | 84.10% | -28.30% | 28.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFOR and SWKS is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 1992 | 0.27 |
The correlation between EFOR and SWKS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFOR:
$1.17B
SWKS:
$9.37B
EFOR:
$1.96
SWKS:
$1.91
EFOR:
14.49
SWKS:
32.58
EFOR:
0.30
SWKS:
2.35
EFOR:
0.65
SWKS:
1.64
EFOR:
$3.97B
SWKS:
$4.01B
EFOR:
$1.11B
SWKS:
$1.64B
EFOR:
$280.70M
SWKS:
$408.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFOR vs. SWKS — Risk / Return Rank
EFOR
SWKS
EFOR vs. SWKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFOR | SWKS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.02 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.15 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -0.26 | -0.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFOR vs. SWKS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFOR drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SWKS drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFOR and SWKS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFOR | SWKS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.98% | -96.12% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.55% | -35.24% | -33.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.72% | -58.20% | -25.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.00% | -71.10% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.00% | -72.88% | -14.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.33% | -63.86% | -14.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -55.83% | +16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.38% | 20.69% | +15.69% |
Volatility
EFOR vs. SWKS - Volatility Comparison
Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) has a higher volatility of 25.60% compared to Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) at 14.34%. This indicates that EFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFOR | SWKS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.60% | 14.34% | +11.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.01% | 36.75% | +52.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.62% | 45.32% | +32.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 41.21% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.42% | 40.17% | +2.25% |
Dividends
EFOR vs. SWKS - Dividend Comparison
EFOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 4.56% | 4.45% | 3.11% | 2.31% | 2.59% | 1.37% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 2.09% | 1.26% | 1.45% | 1.02% |
Financials
EFOR vs. SWKS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everforth, Inc. and Skyworks Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFOR vs. SWKS - Profitability Comparison
EFOR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 301.70M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
SWKS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.10M and revenue of 934.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
EFOR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported an operating income of 28.30M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
SWKS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 48.50M and revenue of 934.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
EFOR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a net income of 14.20M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
SWKS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 33.90M and revenue of 934.80M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFOR and SWKS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFOR has higher volatility (25.60%) compared to SWKS (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFOR dropped -95.98% vs SWKS's -96.12%.
SWKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFOR and SWKS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer