PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFO vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFO vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 10.16%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.21% annualized return.


EFO

1D
-1.58%
1M
6.17%
YTD
12.87%
6M
17.60%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.16%

SSO

1D
-1.40%
1M
9.75%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.81%
1Y
52.69%
3Y*
37.56%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
24.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
12.87%58.51%-2.15%25.77%-33.62%19.38%2.29%40.93%-30.91%51.78%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
19.37%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and SSO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009

0.69

The correlation between EFO and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFO vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFO
SSO

Financial Services

40.7%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

EFO
40.7%
SSO
11.8%

Basic Materials

EFO

-

SSO
1.8%

Communication Services

EFO

-

SSO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EFO

-

SSO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

EFO

-

SSO
4.9%

Energy

EFO

-

SSO
3.5%

Healthcare

EFO

-

SSO
8.5%

Industrials

EFO

-

SSO
8.3%

Real Estate

EFO

-

SSO
1.9%

Technology

EFO

-

SSO
35.6%

Utilities

EFO

-

SSO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFO vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO
EFO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFOSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.91

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

12.80

-7.38

EFO vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFO and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFOSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.25

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.59

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.68

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.42

-0.18

Drawdowns

EFO vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFOSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-84.67%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-18.17%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-35.21%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.95%

-46.73%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.52%

-59.34%

-4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-1.40%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-19.57%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

4.13%

+2.26%

Volatility

EFO vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFOSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

5.66%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

17.78%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.54%

23.60%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

33.65%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

35.89%

-1.80%

EFO vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFO vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than SSO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.54%1.65%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.62%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFO and SSO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFO has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.21% vs 10.16% for EFO. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.

EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFO and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer