EFO vs. SSO
EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EFO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (200%) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFO returned 10.16%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for SSO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
EFO vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 10.16%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.21% annualized return.
EFO
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
EFO vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 12.87% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and SSO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EFO and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFO vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFO
SSO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EFO
SSO
Basic Materials
EFO
-
SSO
Communication Services
EFO
-
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
EFO
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
EFO
-
SSO
Energy
EFO
-
SSO
Healthcare
EFO
-
SSO
Industrials
EFO
-
SSO
Real Estate
EFO
-
SSO
Technology
EFO
-
SSO
Utilities
EFO
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
SSO
EFO vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.91 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 12.80 | -7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.25 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.59 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.68 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.42 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -84.67% | +21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -18.17% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -35.21% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | -46.73% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | -59.34% | -4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -1.40% | -4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -19.57% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 4.13% | +2.26% |
Volatility
EFO vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 5.66% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 17.78% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.54% | 23.60% | +6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 33.65% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 35.89% | -1.80% |
EFO vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFO vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than SSO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFO and SSO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFO has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.21% vs 10.16% for EFO. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.
EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.
EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFO and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer