PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFO vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFO vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EFO

1D
-1.58%
1M
6.17%
YTD
12.87%
6M
17.60%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.16%

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EFO and NTSD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFO vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO
EFO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFONTSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

EFO vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFONTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

5.08

-4.85

Drawdowns

EFO vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFONTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-5.20%

-58.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-1.11%

-4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-0.84%

-17.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

Volatility

EFO vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFONTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.54%

24.28%

+6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

24.28%

+8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

24.28%

+9.81%

EFO vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFO vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.54%1.65%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%
NTSD
WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EFO and NTSD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFO and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer