PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFO vs. BRZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFO vs. BRZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than BRZU's 11.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EFO has outperformed BRZU with an annualized return of 10.16%, while BRZU has yielded a comparatively lower -16.20% annualized return.


EFO

1D
-1.58%
1M
6.17%
YTD
12.87%
6M
17.60%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.16%

BRZU

1D
-6.46%
1M
-22.26%
YTD
11.76%
6M
2.36%
1Y
55.66%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
-16.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. BRZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
12.87%58.51%-2.15%25.77%-33.62%19.38%2.29%40.93%-30.91%51.78%
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
11.76%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and BRZU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.45

The correlation between EFO and BRZU shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFO vs. BRZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFO
BRZU

Financial Services

40.7%
32.7%

Basic Materials

-

13.7%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.2%

Energy

-

18.7%

Healthcare

-

2.4%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

12.8%

Financial Services

EFO
40.7%
BRZU
32.7%

Basic Materials

EFO

-

BRZU
13.7%

Communication Services

EFO

-

BRZU
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EFO

-

BRZU
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

EFO

-

BRZU
4.2%

Energy

EFO

-

BRZU
18.7%

Healthcare

EFO

-

BRZU
2.4%

Industrials

EFO

-

BRZU
10.9%

Real Estate

EFO

-

BRZU

-

Technology

EFO

-

BRZU
0.9%

Utilities

EFO

-

BRZU
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFO vs. BRZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO
EFO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. BRZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFOBRZUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.65

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.73

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

5.24

+0.18

EFO vs. BRZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the BRZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFO and BRZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFOBRZUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

-0.07

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

-0.20

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.35

+0.58

Drawdowns

EFO vs. BRZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum BRZU drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and BRZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFOBRZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-99.71%

+36.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-32.39%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-58.25%

+31.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.95%

-65.00%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.52%

-98.11%

+34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-99.20%

+93.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-89.55%

+70.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

10.66%

-4.27%

Volatility

EFO vs. BRZU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) is 10.08%, while Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that EFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFOBRZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

15.75%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

41.66%

-16.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.54%

49.58%

-19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

55.40%

-22.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

83.15%

-49.06%

EFO vs. BRZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRZU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFO vs. BRZU - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than BRZU's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.39%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.54%1.65%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFO and BRZU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to EFO (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs BRZU's -99.71%.

On 10-year performance, EFO leads with 10.16% vs -16.20% for BRZU. On fees, EFO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EFO has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFO has performed better with a 10.16% return vs -16.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.54% for EFO.

EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 1.29% for BRZU.

EFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFO and BRZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer