EFO vs. AVDV
EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. EFO is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFO returned 7.18%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for AVDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
EFO vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.04% return.
EFO
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
AVDV
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 44.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
EFO vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 12.87% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 14.97% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.04% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and AVDV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between EFO and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFO vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFO
AVDV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EFO
AVDV
Basic Materials
EFO
-
AVDV
Communication Services
EFO
-
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
EFO
-
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
EFO
-
AVDV
Energy
EFO
-
AVDV
Healthcare
EFO
-
AVDV
Industrials
EFO
-
AVDV
Real Estate
EFO
-
AVDV
Technology
EFO
-
AVDV
Utilities
EFO
-
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
AVDV
EFO vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.52 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 3.37 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 13.67 | -8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.86 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.80 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.80 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -43.01% | -20.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -13.19% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -14.17% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | -28.08% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -1.35% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -6.77% | -11.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 3.24% | +3.15% |
Volatility
EFO vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.92%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 4.92% | +5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 13.07% | +12.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.54% | 15.56% | +14.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 17.30% | +15.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 19.73% | +14.36% |
EFO vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFO vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.74% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.54% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFO and AVDV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFO has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 7.18% for EFO. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.54% for EFO.
EFO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFO and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer