EFO vs. AMDG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG).
EFO and AMDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. AMDG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jan 24, 2025.
Performance
EFO vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFO vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | -0.08% | 44.52% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | -21.97% | 96.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than AMDG's -21.97% return.
EFO
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
AMDG
- 1D
- 7.34%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- -21.97%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 133.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFO vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
AMDG
EFO vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.13 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.32 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 4.53 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.35 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and AMDG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFO vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than AMDG's 14.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.73% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 14.36% | 11.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and AMDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -63.04% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -56.48% | +34.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.38% | -52.31% | +35.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -27.66% | +8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 28.88% | -22.88% |
Volatility
EFO vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) is 15.10%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 33.06%. This indicates that EFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.10% | 33.06% | -17.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | 98.59% | -76.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.11% | 129.74% | -94.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.58% | 124.94% | -92.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 124.94% | -91.07% |