EFO vs. ABNG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFO is passively managed, while ABNG is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.

Performance

EFO vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than ABNG's 1.11% return.

EFO

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -1.20%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 31.92%
• 3Y*: 23.59%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

ABNG

• 1D: 7.74%
• 1M: 16.99%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: -0.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	11.39%	4.41%
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF	1.11%	23.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and ABNG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

EFO vs. ABNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO

EFO Risk / Return Rank: 32
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

ABNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFO	ABNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	—	—

Drawdowns

EFO vs. ABNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than ABNG's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and ABNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFO	ABNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.52%	-33.03%	-30.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.78%	-4.70%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.62%	-12.26%	-6.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EFO	ABNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.69%	63.54%	-31.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.19%	63.54%	-30.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.64%	63.54%	-29.90%

EFO vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFO vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while ABNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	1.56%	1.65%	2.24%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFO and ABNG in my portfolio?

EFO and ABNG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EFO or ABNG?

On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFO or ABNG?

ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFO or ABNG?

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for ABNG.

What is the main difference between EFO and ABNG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.75% for ABNG.