EFIV vs. OILK
EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFIV returned 14.48%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFIV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
EFIV vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
EFIV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
EFIV vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.91% | 18.47% | 23.80% | 27.92% | -17.76% | 31.70% | 16.69% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | 12.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFIV and OILK is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.11 |
The correlation between EFIV and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFIV vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFIV
OILK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
EFIV
OILK
-
Communication Services
EFIV
OILK
-
Financial Services
EFIV
OILK
-
Healthcare
EFIV
OILK
-
Industrials
EFIV
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
EFIV
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
EFIV
OILK
Energy
EFIV
OILK
-
Real Estate
EFIV
OILK
-
Utilities
EFIV
OILK
-
Basic Materials
EFIV
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFIV vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
EFIV
OILK
EFIV vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 2.06 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.62 | 2.59 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.34 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.42 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 6.91 | +8.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.06 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.59 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.12 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
EFIV vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -83.76% | +59.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -17.35% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -23.42% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -34.69% | +10.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -3.66% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -32.61% | +27.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 8.56% | -6.52% |
Volatility
EFIV vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is 3.14%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that EFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 10.44% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 23.26% | -14.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 28.75% | -16.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 30.12% | -13.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 35.97% | -19.14% |
EFIV vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFIV vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFIV and OILK have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to EFIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 14.48% for EFIV. On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 14.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.94% for EFIV.
EFIV is categorized as S&P 500, while OILK is Oil & Gas. EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFIV and 0.68% for OILK.
EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFIV and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer