EFIV vs. HIBL

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFIV returned 13.77%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for HIBL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFIV charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.

Performance

EFIV vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 69.56% return.

EFIV

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.99%
• 6M: 9.05%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: —

HIBL

• 1D: 4.17%
• 1M: -5.97%
• 6M: 46.75%
• YTD: 69.56%
• 1Y: 138.34%
• 3Y*: 41.10%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFIV vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF	10.63%	18.47%	23.80%	27.92%	-17.76%	31.70%	16.38%
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	69.56%	60.38%	-0.40%	81.02%	-68.24%	129.14%	132.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and HIBL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2020	0.82

The correlation between EFIV and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFIV vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFIV	HIBL
Technology	38.0%	9.3%
Communication Services	12.6%	0.3%
Financial Services	12.3%	2.8%
Healthcare	10.6%	1.2%
Industrials	8.2%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	2.4%
Energy	2.7%	0.2%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	2.0%	0.6%
Utilities	1.4%	0.6%

Return for Risk

EFIV vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV

EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 74
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 73
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFIV vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFIV	HIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.83	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.22	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.29	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	4.43	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	14.33	-2.79

EFIV vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and HIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFIV	HIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.52%	-88.27%	+63.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-31.39%	+21.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.23%	-69.66%	+50.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-81.58%	+57.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-18.76%	+18.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-43.66%	+38.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	9.69%	-7.59%

Volatility

EFIV vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is 3.94%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 31.10%. This indicates that EFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFIV	HIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	31.10%	-27.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	62.66%	-52.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	75.95%	-63.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	83.62%	-66.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	92.48%	-75.66%

EFIV vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFIV vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than HIBL's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF	0.96%	1.03%	1.20%	1.37%	1.64%	1.19%	0.65%	0.00%
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.34%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFIV and HIBL in my portfolio?

EFIV and HIBL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFIV or HIBL?

HIBL has higher volatility (31.10%) compared to EFIV (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

Which ETF is better, EFIV or HIBL?

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 14.02% vs 13.77% for EFIV. On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFIV or HIBL?

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFIV or HIBL?

EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFIV or HIBL?

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.96% for EFIV.

What is the main difference between EFIV and HIBL?

EFIV is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFIV and 1.12% for HIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.