PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 32.22% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

IXC

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
32.22%
6M
30.00%
1Y
48.10%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
32.22%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and IXC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.42

The correlation between EFAX and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFAX vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
IXC

Financial Services

18.6%

-

Technology

11.6%

-

Industrials

9.5%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%

-

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Communication Services

3.2%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Energy

1.5%
100.0%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
IXC

-

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
IXC

-

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
IXC

-

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
IXC

-

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
IXC

-

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
IXC

-

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
IXC
100.0%

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

5.00

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

15.10

-9.49

EFAX vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXIXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.58

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.32

+0.21

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-67.88%

+35.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-9.66%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-19.06%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-24.93%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-4.84%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-17.48%

+10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.20%

+0.14%

Volatility

EFAX vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) is 5.24%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that EFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

7.50%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

15.42%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

18.75%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

23.50%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

26.85%

-9.75%

EFAX vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAX vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than IXC's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%0.00%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.79%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAX and IXC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to EFAX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 5-year performance, IXC leads with 19.64% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXC has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.

EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.79% for IXC.

EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.46% for IXC.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer