PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. GMOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.76% return.


EFAX

1D
-2.43%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
4.91%
6M
7.11%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*

GMOI

1D
-1.93%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
11.76%
6M
15.15%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
4.91%31.30%-4.37%
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
11.76%45.64%-4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and GMOI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024

0.89

The correlation between EFAX and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOI
GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXGMOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

4.20

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

16.57

-11.70

EFAX vs. GMOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the GMOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and GMOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXGMOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.64

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

2.05

-1.53

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and GMOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXGMOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-14.67%

-17.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-8.36%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-2.11%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-1.70%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

2.11%

+1.24%

Volatility

EFAX vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.90%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXGMOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.90%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

10.49%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

13.31%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

15.64%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

15.64%

+1.47%

EFAX vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAX vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than GMOI's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.27%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
2.45%2.74%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAX and GMOI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to GMOI (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs GMOI's -14.67%.

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 34.93% vs 16.28% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 34.93% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.

EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.45% for GMOI.

EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value. They also come from different issuers: State Street and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.60% for GMOI.

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and GMOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer