EFAX vs. GMOI
EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAX tracks the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index while GMOI tracks the MSCI World ex USA Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EFAX returned 16.28% vs 34.93% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.
Performance
EFAX vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.76% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- —
GMOI
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 11.76%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 34.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAX vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 4.91% | 31.30% | -4.37% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 11.76% | 45.64% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and GMOI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EFAX and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
GMOI
EFAX vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAX | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.46 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 4.20 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 16.57 | -11.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAX | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.64 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 2.05 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and GMOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -14.67% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -8.36% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -2.11% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -1.70% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.11% | +1.24% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.90%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 3.90% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.36% | 10.49% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 13.31% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 15.64% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 15.64% | +1.47% |
EFAX vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAX vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than GMOI's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.27% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.45% | 2.74% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAX and GMOI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to GMOI (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs GMOI's -14.67%.
On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 34.93% vs 16.28% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 34.93% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.45% for GMOI.
EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value. They also come from different issuers: State Street and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAX and GMOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer