EFAX vs. DIA
EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAX returned 7.48%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for DIA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.
Performance
EFAX vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 6.26% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
DIA
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
EFAX vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 6.64% | 31.30% | 4.78% | 18.02% | -16.72% | 10.50% | 9.57% | 23.52% | -14.78% | 23.93% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 6.26% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 9.59% | 24.70% | -3.74% | 28.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and DIA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EFAX and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAX vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAX
DIA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EFAX
DIA
Technology
EFAX
DIA
Industrials
EFAX
DIA
Healthcare
EFAX
DIA
Consumer Cyclical
EFAX
DIA
Basic Materials
EFAX
DIA
Consumer Defensive
EFAX
DIA
Communication Services
EFAX
DIA
Real Estate
EFAX
DIA
-
Energy
EFAX
DIA
Utilities
EFAX
DIA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
DIA
EFAX vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAX | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.18 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 8.42 | -2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAX | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.76 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.66 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and DIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -51.87% | +19.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -9.76% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -15.95% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | -20.76% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -1.13% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -7.14% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.52% | +0.82% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) at 2.97%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 2.97% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 9.28% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 12.10% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 14.78% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 17.53% | -0.43% |
EFAX vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAX vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than DIA's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.38% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.22% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAX and DIA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to DIA (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs DIA's -51.87%.
On 5-year performance, DIA leads with 9.76% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIA has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.
EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.38% for DIA.
EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.16% for DIA.
DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAX and DIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer