EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L
EEWG.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EEWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEWG.L returned 10.59%/yr vs -0.26%/yr for CHRG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEWG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.
Performance
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEWG.L is traded in GBP, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEWG.L achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than CHRG.L's 2.40% return.
EEWG.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- —
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -19.88%
- 6M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- —
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEWG.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.45% | 10.99% | 20.26% | 16.47% | -10.69% | 24.36% | 13.98% |
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 2.40% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 12,965.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEWG.L and CHRG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EEWG.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Financial Services
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
-
Industrials
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Healthcare
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Communication Services
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Energy
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Basic Materials
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Utilities
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
Real Estate
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEWG.L
CHRG.L
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEWG.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 1.07 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.45 | 4.16 | +6.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEWG.L and CHRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEWG.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -52.64% | +27.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -26.04% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.89% | -39.93% | +21.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | -52.64% | +33.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -26.04% | +24.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -21.12% | +17.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 6.74% | -4.93% |
Volatility
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) is 2.85%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that EEWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEWG.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 10.05% | -7.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 21.88% | -13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 29.67% | -18.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 26.54% | -13.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 3,131.35% | -3,116.07% |
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEWG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEWG.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison
EEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEWG.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.12% | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEWG.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEWG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEWG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
EEWG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Lithium & Battery Metals. EEWG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EEWG.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.
Find the right allocation for EEWG.L and CHRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer