EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L
EEWD.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc) and MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - EEWD.L tracks the MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index while MVEW.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEWD.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for MVEW.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEWD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MVEW.L.
Performance
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEWD.L is traded in USD, while MVEW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEWD.L achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.13% return.
EEWD.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
MVEW.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- —
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEWD.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.23% | 19.23% | 18.35% | 23.17% | -20.23% | 22.70% | 17.84% |
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.13% | 11.56% | 10.57% | 9.48% | -11.02% | 16.82% | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEWD.L and MVEW.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EEWD.L and MVEW.L has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Financial Services
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Industrials
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Healthcare
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Communication Services
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Consumer Cyclical
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Consumer Defensive
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Energy
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Basic Materials
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Utilities
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Real Estate
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEWD.L
MVEW.L
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEWD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.05 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.35 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 0.99 | +10.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEWD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.28 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.49 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.64 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEWD.L and MVEW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEWD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.48% | -21.36% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -6.44% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.00% | -8.56% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.90% | -21.36% | -6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -3.33% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -4.32% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.31% | -0.26% |
Volatility
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that EEWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEWD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 1.91% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 5.82% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 8.09% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 11.19% | +4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 11.30% | +6.03% |
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEWD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEWD.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison
EEWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while MVEW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEWD.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc | 1.09% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 1.47% |
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEWD.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEWD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEWD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.
EEWD.L tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EEWD.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.
Find the right allocation for EEWD.L and MVEW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer