EEV vs. BITO
EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. EEV is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EEV returned -34.25%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for BITO. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EEV vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than BITO's -26.37% return.
EEV
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -17.39%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 6M
- -44.23%
- 1Y
- -60.04%
- 3Y*
- -34.25%
- 5Y*
- -15.62%
- 10Y*
- -24.13%
BITO
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -26.37%
- 6M
- -30.81%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEV vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -42.06% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | 10.01% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.37% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEV and BITO is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | -0.37 |
The correlation between EEV and BITO shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEV vs. BITO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEV
BITO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEV
BITO
-
Financial Services
EEV
BITO
Consumer Cyclical
EEV
BITO
-
Industrials
EEV
BITO
-
Basic Materials
EEV
BITO
-
Communication Services
EEV
BITO
-
Energy
EEV
BITO
-
Consumer Defensive
EEV
BITO
-
Healthcare
EEV
BITO
-
Utilities
EEV
BITO
-
Real Estate
EEV
BITO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEV vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
EEV
BITO
EEV vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEV | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | -0.82 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.85 | -1.41 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEV | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.49 | -0.95 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | -0.09 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
EEV vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEV | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -77.86% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.83% | -50.05% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.45% | -50.05% | -26.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.87% | -49.22% | -50.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.00% | -36.73% | -56.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.15% | 29.09% | +5.06% |
Volatility
EEV vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a higher volatility of 17.59% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 9.43%. This indicates that EEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEV | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.59% | 9.43% | +8.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.59% | 34.26% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.37% | 43.57% | -3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.25% | 55.11% | -16.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.13% | 55.11% | -13.98% |
EEV vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EEV and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EEV vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than BITO's 67.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 67.63% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.46% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEV and BITO have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEV has higher volatility (17.59%) compared to BITO (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.87% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 25.27% vs -34.25% for EEV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 25.27% return vs -34.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEV and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 67.63%, compared with 7.46% for EEV.
EEV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.
BITO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.94 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEV and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer