PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEV vs. ASMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EEV vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EEV vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -9.92% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 40.33% return.


EEV

1D
-7.55%
1M
17.84%
YTD
-9.92%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
-44.96%
3Y*
-23.86%
5Y*
-9.60%
10Y*
-20.76%

ASMG

1D
10.26%
1M
-19.89%
YTD
40.33%
6M
61.13%
1Y
199.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEV vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EEV vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEV
EEV Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEV Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEV Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEV vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEVASMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.12

2.42

-3.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.76

2.76

-4.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.35

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

5.48

-6.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.98

14.51

-15.48

EEV vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEV Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the ASMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEV and ASMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEVASMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.12

2.42

-3.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

1.21

-1.66

Correlation

The correlation between EEV and ASMG is -0.57. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EEV vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than ASMG's 7.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
4.80%5.40%4.45%3.45%0.27%0.00%0.14%1.34%0.38%
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
7.98%11.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EEV vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and ASMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EEVASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.83%

-43.95%

-55.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.05%

-34.56%

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.80%

-27.85%

-71.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.94%

-13.57%

-79.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.95%

13.05%

+32.90%

Volatility

EEV vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is 21.55%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a volatility of 30.09%. This indicates that EEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EEVASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.55%

30.09%

-8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.23%

58.83%

-28.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.32%

83.10%

-42.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.24%

82.32%

-45.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.75%

82.32%

-41.57%