EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE
EEUX.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - EEUX.DE tracks the MSCI Europe ESG Filtered Min TE while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEUX.DE returned 9.50%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for AMED.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EEUX.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEUX.DE achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 20.38% return.
EEUX.DE
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- 1Y
- 33.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- —
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEUX.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 10.26% | 19.25% | 8.83% | 15.73% | -11.68% | 24.98% | -2.95% | 27.61% | -94.76% | -0.39% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 20.38% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEUX.DE and AMED.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EEUX.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EEUX.DE
AMED.DE
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EEUX.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEUX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.16 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 12.18 | -3.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEUX.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEUX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.71% | -38.35% | -57.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -10.56% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.45% | -14.07% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.21% | -24.06% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.58% | -0.11% | -88.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.21% | -5.61% | -49.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.75% | -0.19% |
Volatility
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EEUX.DE) is 2.98%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that EEUX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEUX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.29% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 12.89% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.99% | 15.21% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 15.88% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 714.84% | 17.37% | +697.47% |
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEUX.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEUX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EEUX.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EEUX.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EEUX.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
EEUX.DE tracks MSCI Europe ESG Filtered Min TE, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EEUX.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for EEUX.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer