EETH vs. CBXO
EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - EETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
EETH vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -36.80% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.65% return.
EETH
- 1D
- -4.54%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -36.80%
- 6M
- -37.26%
- 1Y
- -28.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 6M
- -4.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EETH vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -36.80% | -34.51% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.65% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EETH and CBXO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EETH vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
EETH
CBXO
EETH vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EETH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EETH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | -2.36 | +2.33 |
Drawdowns
EETH vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EETH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -11.37% | -55.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.06% | -11.37% | -50.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -8.44% | -20.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.55% | — | — |
Volatility
EETH vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EETH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.60% | 7.25% | +61.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 7.25% | +61.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 7.25% | +61.64% |
EETH vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EETH vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.06%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 84.06% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EETH and CBXO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EETH.
EETH has the higher dividend yield at 84.06%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
EETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EETH and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for EETH and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer