EETH vs. BFJL
EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - EETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). EETH is actively managed, while BFJL is passively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -49.03% vs -14.80% for BFJL. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
EETH vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -38.56% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -5.11% return.
EETH
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- 6M
- -31.24%
- YTD
- -38.56%
- 1Y
- -49.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.00%
BFJL
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- -14.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.56K | $8.09K | $4.95K | |
| $666.61K | $697.40K | $772.42K |
EETH vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -38.56% | 14.30% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -5.11% | -7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EETH and BFJL is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EETH and BFJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EETH vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank
EETH
BFJL
EETH vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EETH | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.81 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.74 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.00 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EETH vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EETH | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -21.27% | -47.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.22% | -21.27% | -47.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.12% | -19.01% | -44.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.48% | -12.90% | -18.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.54% | 15.74% | +30.80% |
Volatility
EETH vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) at 3.65%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EETH | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 3.65% | +9.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.92% | 5.54% | +40.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.62% | 13.20% | +54.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 13.17% | +55.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 13.17% | +55.19% |
EETH vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
EETH vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 86.45%, more than BFJL's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.42% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 73.66% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EETH and BFJL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EETH has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to BFJL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -69.22% vs BFJL's -21.27%.
On 1-year performance, BFJL leads with -14.80% vs -49.03% for EETH. On fees, BFJL is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BFJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BFJL has performed better with a -14.80% return vs -49.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BFJL is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EETH.
EETH has the higher dividend yield at 73.66%, compared with 1.42% for BFJL.
EETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EETH and 0.90% for BFJL.
EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EETH and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer