EETH vs. BETE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -49.03% vs -46.67% for BETE. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EETH vs. BETE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -38.56% return, which is significantly lower than BETE's -34.37% return.

EETH

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: 9.70%
• 6M: -31.24%
• YTD: -38.56%
• 1Y: -49.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.00%

BETE

• 1D: -3.01%
• 1M: 5.60%
• 6M: -28.81%
• YTD: -34.37%
• 1Y: -46.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	$107.88K	$90.06K	$96.80K
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	$666.61K	$697.40K	$772.42K

EETH vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	-38.56%	-17.19%	33.29%	31.40%
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-34.37%	-8.17%	66.02%	36.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EETH and BETE is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.96

The correlation between EETH and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EETH vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EETH

EETH Risk / Return Rank: 3
EETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EETH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EETH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 3
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EETH vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EETH	BETE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	-0.89	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.06	-1.30	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.86	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.80	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	-1.21	+0.09

EETH vs. BETE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the BETE Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EETH and BETE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EETH vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and BETE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EETH	BETE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.22%	-61.75%	-7.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.22%	-61.75%	-7.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.12%	-56.97%	-6.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.48%	-23.44%	-8.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.54%	40.62%	+5.92%

Volatility

EETH vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) at 11.10%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EETH	BETE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.16%	11.10%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.92%	39.57%	+6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.62%	55.28%	+12.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.36%	56.01%	+12.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.36%	56.01%	+12.35%

EETH vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EETH and BETE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EETH vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison

EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 86.45%, more than BETE's 79.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	64.54%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	73.66%	56.98%	10.82%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EETH and BETE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, EETH and BETE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EETH or BETE?

EETH has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to BETE (11.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -69.22% vs BETE's -61.75%.

Which ETF is better, EETH or BETE?

On 1-year performance, BETE leads with -46.67% vs -49.03% for EETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 11.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EETH or BETE?

Over the 1-year period, BETE has performed better with a -46.67% return vs -49.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EETH or BETE?

EETH and BETE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EETH or BETE?

EETH has the higher dividend yield at 73.66%, compared with 64.54% for BETE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.