EETH vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -31.81% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. EETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

EETH vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -45.17% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

EETH

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -19.80%
• YTD: -45.17%
• 6M: -45.15%
• 1Y: -31.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EETH vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	-45.17%	-17.19%	33.29%	31.40%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EETH and BAMU is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	-0.02

Return for Risk

EETH vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EETH

EETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
EETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EETH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EETH vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EETH	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	4.94	-5.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	8.71	-9.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	2.41	-1.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	24.37	-24.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	96.52	-97.29

EETH vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EETH and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EETH vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EETH	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.70%	-0.36%	-68.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.70%	-0.12%	-68.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.08%	0.00%	-67.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.17%	-0.02%	-30.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.47%	0.03%	+41.44%

Volatility

EETH vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EETH	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.49%	0.09%	+19.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.97%	0.39%	+46.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.41%	0.58%	+68.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.09%	0.87%	+68.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.09%	0.87%	+68.22%

EETH vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EETH vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.89%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	96.89%	56.98%	10.82%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EETH and BAMU in my portfolio?

EETH and BAMU have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EETH or BAMU?

EETH has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -68.70% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, EETH or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -31.81% for EETH. On fees, EETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EETH or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -31.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EETH or BAMU?

EETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EETH or BAMU?

EETH has the higher dividend yield at 96.89%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between EETH and BAMU?

EETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EETH and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.